<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Gothic Guardian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gothicguardian.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gothicguardian.com</link>
	<description>The Conservative Magazine of Duke University</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 05:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dining Options Marginalize Low Income Students by Nil jhonson</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/04/30/dining-options-marginalize-low-income-students/comment-page-1/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>Nil jhonson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 05:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=530#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>Very excellent article about Dining Options! In my view Changes need to be made so that every student can eat both healthily and affordably. Thanks for open door ideas :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very excellent article about Dining Options! In my view Changes need to be made so that every student can eat both healthily and affordably. Thanks for open door ideas <img src='http://gothicguardian.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Pope and Condoms: What Would Jesus Do? by Taylor</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2011/02/06/the-pope-and-condoms-what-would-jesus-do/comment-page-1/#comment-2172</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=877#comment-2172</guid>
		<description>Two major points:
1) It&#039;s Pope Benedict XVI, not XV.
2)It is very unclear as to what is meant by people use condoms with &quot;good intentions.&quot;  The Catholic Church has always held that sex should only take place among married couples and that married couples should not use condoms because sex is meant to be an expression of love of partner and of God that produces offspring.  Thus, nobody should use condoms.  Not anyone.  Ever.  This article totally neglects the Catholic Church&#039;s reasoning behind not allowing contraceptive use.  To say that these restrictions are unnecessarily strict shows a lack of understanding for basic Catholic theology.  In fact many Catholics disagree with the pope&#039;s decision to condone the use of condoms in these cases, because it suggests that there are cases in which not being monogamous is acceptable.

Also, this article makes the argument that married couples not ready to have children should use contraception.  This again goes against basic Catholic thought.  The purpose of marriage is to express love that produces offspring.  To say you can be married and have sex just for fun without having an interest in reproduction goes against the fundamental Catholic concept of marriage.

The author of this article lacks any understanding of the church&#039;s ideals.  He probably shouldn&#039;t be writing about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two major points:<br />
1) It&#8217;s Pope Benedict XVI, not XV.<br />
2)It is very unclear as to what is meant by people use condoms with &#8220;good intentions.&#8221;  The Catholic Church has always held that sex should only take place among married couples and that married couples should not use condoms because sex is meant to be an expression of love of partner and of God that produces offspring.  Thus, nobody should use condoms.  Not anyone.  Ever.  This article totally neglects the Catholic Church&#8217;s reasoning behind not allowing contraceptive use.  To say that these restrictions are unnecessarily strict shows a lack of understanding for basic Catholic theology.  In fact many Catholics disagree with the pope&#8217;s decision to condone the use of condoms in these cases, because it suggests that there are cases in which not being monogamous is acceptable.</p>
<p>Also, this article makes the argument that married couples not ready to have children should use contraception.  This again goes against basic Catholic thought.  The purpose of marriage is to express love that produces offspring.  To say you can be married and have sex just for fun without having an interest in reproduction goes against the fundamental Catholic concept of marriage.</p>
<p>The author of this article lacks any understanding of the church&#8217;s ideals.  He probably shouldn&#8217;t be writing about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans young in 2011 by Tweets that mention The Gothic Guardian » Blog Archive » Republicans young in 2011 -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2011/02/03/republicans-young-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Gothic Guardian » Blog Archive » Republicans young in 2011 -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=864#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by theymightier, Collegiate Network. Collegiate Network said: CN publication The Gothic Guardian reports on 2011&#039;s &quot;youthful and fresh&quot; Republican party. http://fb.me/TpazRzLO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by theymightier, Collegiate Network. Collegiate Network said: CN publication The Gothic Guardian reports on 2011&#039;s &quot;youthful and fresh&quot; Republican party. <a href="http://fb.me/TpazRzLO" rel="nofollow">http://fb.me/TpazRzLO</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Republicans young in 2011 by Nick Barron</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2011/02/03/republicans-young-in-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-1746</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Barron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=864#comment-1746</guid>
		<description>Nice post, showing a recent trend on Millennials and politics. I&#039;ll post a tweet to this from my blog&#039;s Twitter feed. If you ever want to submit a guest post to my blog, theYmightier.com, I&#039;d love to see what you write. You can submit via this page - http://bit.ly/he5frN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, showing a recent trend on Millennials and politics. I&#8217;ll post a tweet to this from my blog&#8217;s Twitter feed. If you ever want to submit a guest post to my blog, theYmightier.com, I&#8217;d love to see what you write. You can submit via this page &#8211; <a href="http://bit.ly/he5frN" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/he5frN</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Interview with US Congressional Candidate BJ Lawson by water damage corona</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/04/30/an-interview-with-us-congressional-candidate-bj-lawson/comment-page-1/#comment-1595</link>
		<dc:creator>water damage corona</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=522#comment-1595</guid>
		<description>Took me awhile to read all the comments, but i actually enjoyed the article. It proved to be very useful to me and read to all the commenters at this point! It&#039;s always nice for your requirements not only be smart, but also engaged! I&#039;m sure you felt the need fun writing this piece of writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Took me awhile to read all the comments, but i actually enjoyed the article. It proved to be very useful to me and read to all the commenters at this point! It&#8217;s always nice for your requirements not only be smart, but also engaged! I&#8217;m sure you felt the need fun writing this piece of writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Goodbye &#8220;Don&#8217;t Ask, Don&#8217;t Tell&#8221; by Tom Haverford</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/11/04/goodbye-dont-ask-dont-tell/comment-page-1/#comment-1501</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Haverford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=784#comment-1501</guid>
		<description>With no thanks to the Republican party.  The GOP will always be the party of discrimination.  At least they don&#039;t flipflop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With no thanks to the Republican party.  The GOP will always be the party of discrimination.  At least they don&#8217;t flipflop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Four Loko doesn’t kill people…People kill people by Bob Serwetz</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/11/14/four-loko-doesn%e2%80%99t-kill-people%e2%80%a6people-kill-people/comment-page-1/#comment-1394</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Serwetz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 20:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=788#comment-1394</guid>
		<description>Bravo! Couldn&#039;t find one thing to disagree with, I really enjoyed reading this. We&#039;ll see what happens!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo! Couldn&#8217;t find one thing to disagree with, I really enjoyed reading this. We&#8217;ll see what happens!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Victims in a Modern Age by RT downthehall</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/11/18/victims-in-a-modern-age/comment-page-1/#comment-1385</link>
		<dc:creator>RT downthehall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 21:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=831#comment-1385</guid>
		<description>This is great Chloe! You should&#039;ve told everyone when it was published!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great Chloe! You should&#8217;ve told everyone when it was published!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawson strong in public forum against incumbent Price by Chris</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/10/25/lawson-strong-in-public-forum-against-incumbent-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1158</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 05:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=756#comment-1158</guid>
		<description>Excellent article but you failed to mention that BJ is also Dr. lawson.  With all the concern about healthcare inefficiency these days, one would think that physicians&#039; voices would be the most sought out on how to better streamline and reform the complete nightmarish bureacracy that is the current Medicare/third party system.  BJ has some fantastic ideas on this that would allow a return to the doctor/patient relationship of 40 years ago while lowering costs, improving access to care, and promoting better medical outcomes.  As a former business owner, he also knows the ins and outs of proving health insurance to his employees.  Who better in congress these days is better equipped to sort through and help develop intelligent healthcare reform than someone with both thorough medical training as a doctor as well as practical understanding of business economics than a guy like BJ Lawson?  It just seems like a no brainer to vote for him.  Can Price claim any of BJ&#039;s unique skillset?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article but you failed to mention that BJ is also Dr. lawson.  With all the concern about healthcare inefficiency these days, one would think that physicians&#8217; voices would be the most sought out on how to better streamline and reform the complete nightmarish bureacracy that is the current Medicare/third party system.  BJ has some fantastic ideas on this that would allow a return to the doctor/patient relationship of 40 years ago while lowering costs, improving access to care, and promoting better medical outcomes.  As a former business owner, he also knows the ins and outs of proving health insurance to his employees.  Who better in congress these days is better equipped to sort through and help develop intelligent healthcare reform than someone with both thorough medical training as a doctor as well as practical understanding of business economics than a guy like BJ Lawson?  It just seems like a no brainer to vote for him.  Can Price claim any of BJ&#8217;s unique skillset?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lawson strong in public forum against incumbent Price by Alex</title>
		<link>http://gothicguardian.com/2010/10/25/lawson-strong-in-public-forum-against-incumbent-price/comment-page-1/#comment-1152</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gothicguardian.com/?p=756#comment-1152</guid>
		<description>Well done article. As a future physician and current Duke med student, I&#039;m rooting for Lawson. He&#039;s got the experience, the knowledge and the principles to reform Washington. He seems sincere in his commitment to limited and Constitutional gov&#039;t. Thanks for the write up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done article. As a future physician and current Duke med student, I&#8217;m rooting for Lawson. He&#8217;s got the experience, the knowledge and the principles to reform Washington. He seems sincere in his commitment to limited and Constitutional gov&#8217;t. Thanks for the write up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

